Security Information

The Move to a New Anti-Virus Model


This is the second in a series of articles highlighting reasons why we need a new model for anti-virus and security solutions.

Reason #1: the Basic Model

Anti-virus software vendors still rely on yesterday's methods for solving today's problems: they wait for the next virus to wreak havoc and then produce a solution. That worked for a long time when a virus would take years to traverse the world. But in this fast-paced Interet-crazed world we live in today, this type of solution is no longer applicable. Now a virus can traverse the world and infect millions of computers in minutes.

In the good old days a virus traveled by floppy disk. Put a floppy in your computer and save some data to it and the virus would infect the floppy. Then unwittingly put the infected floppy in another computer and presto the new computer would become infected. (I'm skimming over a lot of detail here to make a point). So the virus' progress was slow and steady. Anti-virus vendors had time on their side. They had the time to get a copy of the virus, dissect it, run it through a series of tests to come up with a signature string (see below for definition), put the string into a database of strings to search for when scanning your hard drive (and floppies) and release the new database to the public. Ten years ago this system worked very well.

But now everyone is connected via the Internet. Now, using email as a transport point, it doesn't take years to gather momentum, instead it takes a matter of minutes. And here is where the model breaks. Step back and ask yourself the following question: if vendors can catch "known and unknown viruses" as their literature states, how then is it that we continue to have virus problems?

The answer lies in the fact that virus authors have been more creative in coming up with new ways to infect and wreak havoc and the software industry has not responded in kind, preferring to stay embedded in its old fashioned methodologies.

Why don't the old ways work any more, you might ask? It's relatively simple. Let's go through the steps.

A virus author unleashes NewVirus via email. He mass mails his virus to thousands of people. Some, not all, unwittingly open the attachment thinking it's from a friend or the subject is so enticing that they are fooled into opening it without thinking it's a problem (cf. nude pictures of Anna Kournikova). The email attachment immediately starts emailing everyone in his contact list and embeds itself into his operating system so that it's activated every time he turns on his computer.

The folks he emails in turn get fooled into thinking the email is valid and they open the attachment. Very quickly all hell breaks loose. Agencies which monitor Internet traffic see problems arising with the sudden spikes in email traffic and they begin to get calls or emails alerting them to the fact that there's a new problem. Samples are obtained and sent off to anti-virus vendors. They pass the emails through a series of tests to analyze what exactly the virus does and how it does it. Additionally analysis is performed to extract a unique string of 1's and 0's to identify this attachment as none other than NewVirus. This is called the signature string. It's important that whatever string is arrived at does not exist in any other program or piece of software; otherwise, you will get what is commonly called a false positive.

Quick digression on "false positives": if a vendor arrives at a unique string that just happens to be embedded in Microsoft Word, then every time a user runs a scan of their hard drive, Microsoft Word will be identified as being infected with NewVirus. Users will uninstall Word and re-install only to learn that they are still infected. There will be complaints; the vendor will be forced to re-assess the signature string and re-release his list of strings and admit the error.

Typically signature strings are matched against a whole boatload of commonplace software just to protect against this occurrence, but it still happens and vendors learn to add new software to their test beds.

OK, so the vendor has arrived at a signature string. Next? Implement the string into their string database so that when their scanners are scanning they will match what's on your hard drive to what's in the database. After the database has been updated they release the database to their customers in what's commonly called a "push" where they send the updates to their primary users.

If you did not buy into this service, you must know enough to log into your anti-virus vendor and update your software so that you stay current.

So where are we? The bad guy -or problem teenager- has unleashed NewVirus. NewVirus has infected thousands of computers; vendors have been alerted; NewVirus continues to infect; solutions are achieved and "pushed" to corporate clients; NewVirus continues to infect hundreds and thousands of computers; corporate clients breathe a sigh of relief and alert their users as to the new threat.

Thousands, if not millions, of computers become infected and need to be cleaned because the best way to solve the virus problem is to wait for each new virus to come along and solve on a case by case basis.

But if you sat back and said: what if? What if you categorized all the things a virus can do (or could do), built a series of computers to allow any email attachment or program to have full rein of a computer (much like it would have on your own computer - such a computer is called "honeypot") and then analyze that computer for unwelcome behavior?

That would be a true pre-emptive strike against all malicious software. This is the behavior-based model. Such a model would actually protect you unknown viruses, along with all the known 70,000 viruses.

In part 2 we'll discuss the risks and security failures of having distributed vendor software on your desktop.

About The Author

Tim Klemmer
CEO, OnceRed LLC
http://www.checkinmyemail.com

Tim Klemmer has spent the better part of 12 years designing and perfecting the first true patented behavior-based solution to malicious software.

timklemmer@checkinmyemail.com


MORE RESOURCES:

How the NSA Took Linux To the Next Level
Slashdot - 6 hours ago
In RBAC, permissions are provided based on roles that are granted by the security system. The concept of a role differs from that of a traditional group in ...
Anatomy of Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux) OS News
all 1,730 news articles


Private security firms say no way to meet demand of 2010 Winter Games
The Canadian Press, VANCOUVER - 8 hours ago
VANCOUVER — There's no way the private security industry can meet the demands from either Olympic organizers or the RCMP for help during the 2010 Winter ...
RCMP checking into downtown Vancouver hotel for 2010 Olympic Games The Canadian Press
all 32 news articles


No need to check background of cabinet spouses, partners, says Day
The Canadian Press, OTTAWA - 7 hours ago
OTTAWA — Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day says there's no need to run security checks on the spouses or partners of federal cabinet ministers, ...
Minister to face grilling by Commons over judgment Globe and Mail
Foreign Affairs Minister Maxime Bernier under fire CTV.ca
Bloc calls for Bernier security probe Toronto Star
Canada.com - The Gazette (Montreal)
all 321 news articles


Secure Computing delivers security gateway virtual appliances for ...
Al-Bawaba, Jordan - 1 hour ago
Secure Computing Corporation (Nasdaq: SCUR), a leading enterprise gateway security provider, has announced it is working with VMware to provide customers ...


Rebate excludes many taxpayers with foreign spouses
The Associated Press - 8 hours ago
But Shelat is married to a foreigner who still hasn't completed the often years-long process that allows her to apply for a Social Security number. ...


China's biggest city beefs up subway security check
Xinhua, China - 32 minutes ago
The increased workforce was expected to help speed up security checks during work day rush hours to ensure smooth traffic flow as well as improve Metro ...


Peninsula On-line

IB blames 'slack' BSF for infiltration
Times of India, India - 6 hours ago
It is fairly common for security forces engaged in counter-terrorism operations to lower their guard during periods of lull. What is also common is that ...
Jammu terrorist attack defies BSF claims Merinews
Hostage crisis over in Jammu, 2 terrorists killed CNN-IBN
Militants strikes back: Heavy Firing along LoC Little About
Reuters India - CNN-IBN
all 126 news articles


China's energy security moves it closer to the Middle East
Daily Star - Lebanon, Lebanon - 4 hours ago
Therefore China has a significant interest in the Middle East, and any changes in the situation there will affect China's energy security. ...


The Southern Ledger

Security source: Terrorists firing mortars to avoid retaliation
Ynetnews, Israel - 4 hours ago
'We cannot continue living under fire without proper fortification,' one resident says The problem, according to a security source, stems from the ...
Negev council head: Government busy with investigations instead of ... Ynetnews
all 179 news articles


WBT

Gov't of Sudan to lodge complaint to UN Security Council against Chad
Xinhua, China - 5 hours ago
KHARTOUM, May 11 (Xinhua) -- Sudan announced on Sunday it would lodge an official complaint to the United Nations Security Council against Chad's government ...
Sudan steps up security, says Darfur rebels advance Reuters
Sudan Imposes Curfew to Hunt for Darfur Rebels in Capital; Cuts ... Voice of America
Sudan cuts ties with Chad The Associated Press
Yahoo! Italia Notizie - New York Times
all 661 news articles

Security - Google News

home | site map

Visit our other sites:
GamesBlog | GamingDepot | GimmeaRide | GimmeNetwork | Golf Biz | HotorNotGame | I Want Computers | I Want Games | I Want Hosting | I Want Music | I Want Security | JokeBox | ScriptShock | Wantedfonts | Webalize
© 2006